Follow a practical business question through the evidence, decision, handover and learning. This story explains a workflow; it does not claim a customer result.
“Which tenants are still missing at the reporting cut-off?”
Fundle Brain
01
Establish what is due
Use the tenant master, trading calendar and reporting rules to define the day’s expected records. Record known closures and exceptions.
02
Collect and validate
Receive the supported POS or file submissions. Check dates, duplicates, unusual amounts and the agreed sales definition before accepting the reporting view.
03
Resolve the gaps
Separate missing data from genuine zero trading. Send the relevant follow-up through the agreed operating process and preserve correction history.
04
Explain the day
Summarise comparable sales, category movement, coverage and the exceptions that still matter. Make the reporting cut-off visible in the brief.
THE STORY BEHIND THE WORKFLOW01
The signal
The team needs a trading view before every tenant has completed reporting. Identify the missing, rejected and validated submissions before describing performance.
02
The decision
Select a comparable tenant set and consistent sales definition. Examine category movement and distinguish a genuine trading change from a reporting correction.
03
The handover
Give the mall team a concise brief: what is complete, what changed, what needs explanation and who owns each follow-up.
04
The learning
Close reporting gaps and track corrections. Keep the resulting brief connected to the commercial discussion so the next morning starts with better context.
PUT THE STORY TO WORK
Your business. Your source context.
Tenant master, daily sales, reporting calendar, area definitions and approved POS or file connections.
Completion status, exception queues, tenant comparisons and daily management briefs.
